Anti-Science Museum Set To Open

Jesus rode a dinosaurThe Creation Museum in Northern Kentucky, a $27 million religious showcase is scheduled to open it's doors on Memorial Day this year.
 
The "museum" (quotes are appropriate every time I mention this place but will get annoying so implied quotes for the rest of this post please) is based on a literal interpretation of the Bible: The world was created in six, 24-hour days, some time between 6,000 and 10,000 years ago. Humans appeared on day 6, and they didn't evolve from nothing.
 
The museum explains that there were dinosaurs of every kind aboard Noah's ark and some dinos even managed to hang around until just a few hundred years ago. Wait, Noah's arc? These people have obviously not seen Jurassic Park II - The Lost World because if they had, they would know that when you put a dinosaur on a boat, pandemonium ensues!
 
Some other great facts you'll learn while making your pilgrimage to KY:
  • Tyrannosaurus Rex was a strict vegetarian and lived with Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden
  • The light from the stars we see did not take millions of years to get here
  • Fossils in rock layers are animals that drowned in the flood
  • Belief in evolution is a major cause of abortion and pornography
  • Answers in Genesis (the group building the museum) are ass-raping the word "science"
Can you find the squirell? CAn you find his nuts?

It seems that the people who are so opposed to the idea of evolution are coincidentally the same people who are pushing to devolve the scientific knowledge of the world. Ironic, no?
 
This is not a museum, this is just another attack in the war on science. This is an affront to common sense. This is where you can take your home-schooled kids for a field trip (whew, finally - poor home-schoolers). This is a salute to brilliant TV shows like the Flintstones and Land of the Lost.
 
This is pissing me off.
 
When the Gallup Poll asked people about their views on the subject last March, 47 percent of Americans polled said that God created humans in their present form some time in the last 10,000 years. That belief was strongest among those with less education, regular churchgoers, people 65 and older, and Republicans.
 
Jesus creates a dinosaur

I'm not anti religion. I support diversity. This museum gets me mad because it masks religious beliefs (which are fine) as science and fact (not cool). That's just plain propaganda.
 
"The evolutionists use dinosaurs to promote their world view; we're going to use that to promote our world view" - Answers in Genesis spokesman Mark Looy.

Comments

jules's picture

for posting a picture of jesus carrying a cross on the back of a dinosaur.

I am going to make this pilgrimage. Its sort of on the way to the park where you can see neon fairies. Which were created by God on the 5th day if I am correct. Or something.

Jason's picture
It's all about searching Google with the right words.
 
Fairies are the devils work I beleive.
InShaneee's picture
You can whine about this, or we can FIGHT BACK!

It's very simple, really. They want to call reading the bible and thinking really, really hard about what some obscure prose means 'science'? Fine. But we're going to be borrowing some of their terminology for a bit. Examples:

Pedophilia: "Spreading the word of God to the children"
Masturbation: "Rapture"
Beer, TV, and Doritos: "The Holy Trinity"

I could go on, but I'd rather not get my house burned down.
Jason's picture
We could call all of our friends God - "Hey, what up, dog God?"
 
I'm just going to stick to worshiping false idols and keeping my hands idle to better facilitate demon puppet shows.
Papillon's picture
it's been a huge conspiracy since the beginning of time- to manipulate morons with god-fear. damn morons.
the shuffmiester's picture
I'm not impressed. Its the same idea as that Baptist church that made a haunted house based on Revelations. These douche bags are just old farts who are going to eventually die out, leaving behind their homo-loving, fetus-killing, antichrist children to ruin everything for which they worked so hard. I cannot friggin wait.
Anonymous's picture
Before you make snap judgments regarding whether or not creation science has validity, I must ask you, have you done the research for yourself? I grew up an athiest, a happy one for the most part, and I believed in evolution, but only b/c it was taught to me in school, not b/c I really did the research (both sides) for myself. I consider myself to have a very open mind. Do you? Have you sincerely sought out the scientific truth on this issue? I really mean that. Have you considered exhaustively the evidence from both sides? I have. I'm convinced. There is a supreme designer who designed this unbelievably organized universe and everything in it. Further, I've yet to see an evolutionist beat a creation scientist in a debate. So, have you? What do you really know about the origin of the universe, the origin of the earth, and the origin of man? Be careful not to make rash, arrogant statements w/o first studying the facts.
Papillon's picture
... but i did mine, throughout middle and high school. curious, openminded and wanting to believe it something beautiful- methodist, lutheran, catholic and baptist, evening service, Sunday service, bible class and youth group. thank goodness they did not grab me younger. it is sick what these people do to the minds of small impressionable children, turning them into small minded intolerant bigots.
 
facts? do you deny the gospels were all written twenty to seventy years after the death of Christ? passed down orally for seventy years- the longest known game of telephone- the New Testament, centuries later. you have put faith in thousands of people you or anyone living have ever met- none of them actually Christ- people that made their damn good living from tithing- do you believe the world was created approximately 10,000 years ago? because if you do, you are a moron. if you don't, then maybe you and all your reasonable christian friends should stop judging all the sinners and write a new millenia testament that is a little less ridiculous.
 
you haven't seen a scientist beat a creationist in a debate? that's because a scientist needs FACTS. creationalist can make things up based on faith. you people lay the faith on too thick- and for people too young to understand when to use it instead of common sense, it creates a lifetime of poor decision making. but honestly, if it makes you happy; more power to you. namaste anonymous.
Jason's picture
Dear Zealot,
The fact that you left your comment anonymously and the fact that your comment sounds preconceived and doesn't respond directly to anything in the post brings me to the assumption that you are cowardly and a propagandist. You're actually not the first - I've been hit with Islamic comment spam too.
 
Considering your "type", you will most likely never read this reply (afraid of debate or afraid of facing the truth?) but I'll respond anyway.
 
"Before you make snap judgments regarding whether or not creation science has validity"
 
Snap judgments? I'm 31 years old and have understood evolution for at least 2/3 of my life - not a snap judgment. The words "creation science" don't even have validity. Creationism is a faith based concept. It has nothing to do with science. It can not be proven using the scientific method or any other method. Just because you don't agree with science doesn't mean that you can try to redefine or bastardize the language it uses.
 
"I consider myself to have a very open mind. Do you?"
 
I won't go into the naughty/illegal details but if it were a contest, I think I might win.
 
"I've yet to see an evolutionist beat a creation scientist in a debate."
 
That's because scientists, real scientists, don't need to debate evolution. It's a fact that is supported by evidence all around us. It would be like debating gravity. What would you think of someone who insisted on debating the existence of gravity? Additionally, why would a scientist want to argue your faith? They are two different things - a fact you are obviously not clear on due to your repetitive use of the phrase "creation science".
 
Why isn't creationism taught in schools? Because it is a religious concept. Whe do not teach religion in our schools because (unlike the Taliban) we are not a theocracy nor should we seek to foster/stifle any one faith under the guise of education.

Excellent response, Papillon. It seems that within the (very open) confines of GorillaSushi, science has won this battle (today).
Sean Vollendorf's picture
Jason, Thanks for responding! Never been called Zealot before. Not sure how to interpret that. None of my friends (irreligious ones, religious ones, athiests, etc...) have ever called me that. But I see that you are zealous and strong in your fight against something you don't think exists, so I guess maybe you could be called a zealot as well. I don't resent it. Sorry, I didn't realize that I needed to leave my info on there (I didn't even notice the opportunity). My cell # is 479.283.9694 Give me a call. How's that for not being anonymous? Jason, my full name is Sean Vollendorf (first and last name) and I'd love to hear from you. My email is svollendorf@gmail.com I'm not afraid of any of my views, nor am I afraid of any of yours for that matter. Remember that you called me cowardly for not posting my info. I look forward to your call, so we can talk directly to each other, like men. One thing I appreciate is your willingness to debate this stuff; many athiests (don't know if you are one or not) are angry or afraid. Call me anytime. By the way, you still didn't give me any facts in your blog, despite the fact that you claim all information points to the evolutionary theory. Saying (essentially) that all the proof is there for evolution and that, therefore, evolutionists don't have to debate creationists is ludicrous. Frankly, it seems an insecure position. Surely you see that as a weak stance that evolutionists have taken (many have taken such a stance). If creationism is so empty and unfounded, then, considering its bold claims, evolutionists should jump at the chance to make it look stupid from a scientific standpoint. Don't you agree? I'm just asking for a few solid facts that have led you to believe in the evolutionary theory. If all the facts point to evolution, then give me a couple (educate me). It shouldn't be that hard. Here are a few things for you think about. I'll give you some time to research and then give me a call and let's talk directly. You mentioned that I'm probably too scared to leave my info. I'm not. Just give me a shout. I have confidence that you're not too scared to call me. I look forward to the call. By the way, I promise to not try to convert you to any religion, and I'll let you try to convert me to whatever you want to. I invite that. Sounds more than generous, don't you think? Here you go... 1) Design implies a designer. There is no doubt that this world is grandly designed. Only a genius mind could have dreamed up the ecosystem (too bad we humans are ruining it: I am very green), the stars, the solar system, the billions of galaxies, photosynthesis, the great explosion of pleasure built into human sexuality, the eye, the bombardier beetle, bird wings, the metamorphosis of a caterpillar into a butterfly. We could go on and on in awe of what surrounds us (and never stop talking about just the earth, let alone what exists in outer space). No one would look at a BMW and conclude that a junkyard explosion resulted in the car. From an engineering perspective, the earth's systems, nature, and the animal kingdom all make a BMW look like child's play. Q: How do you explain the complex, genius design of the universe? Do you attribute it to chance? If so, that seems to be a HUGE leap of faith. 2) DNA --> Carl Sagan said that a simple message (even a "hello") from outer space would be proof of intelligent life elsewhere. If you see "Jerry loves Sally" on the beach, you would be convinced that a person wrote this, not the wind or the waves. Why? B/c only intelligent life could write this message (I am using Carl Sagan's argument here). Here's the point: DNA is the most complex, amazing, message that was ever created. In the words of Bill Gates, it is the "most fascinating computer code ever written." It boggles the mind how specific and complicated the encoding of DNA is. Q: Do you believe that DNA, more complex than anything microsoft has ever produced, is the result of chance? 3) Life from non-life has never occurred in an observable scientific experiment. It never will. Man cannon create life from non-life. Chance cannot create it either. It's never been observed. Science is based on observable data. These are just 3 "things to think about." Note that I'm not asking for your cell #, and obviously I don't want to be harrassed, but I am not afraid of good, heated debate either. So give me a shout after you have some good answers for these "thoughts." To be honest, I don't anticipate being able to change your mind, but I always enjoy solid debate rooted in the facts (and, I am willing to change my mind when I am proven wrong, unlike many evolutionists AND creationists alike). I have learned much from my friends on both sides of this argument over the years, so I am sincere above when I say, "Educate me." But I expect you to come with solid arguments since you are so strong in your belief. Finally, I'm not looking for creationism to be taught in schools, and I am highly oppposed to any religion being taught in our schools. I am looking for science to be taught in science classes, as are you. But let's let the facts win out. Thanks for taking the time to read this, and I look forward to your call- Sean Vollendorf 479.283.9694
Jason's picture
I will not be calling you.
Interesting idea of posting your cell number on a publicly viewed website though (almost 2 months later).
 
I think Charles Darwin has done a fine job at proving evolution - for me to argue it would be an insult to his findings.
 
The bottom line? How can I argue with someone who beleives in some invisible magic guy in the sky that controls and has created everything? Rational people know that unicorns don't exist but if I said "they do exist but they're invisible" then who would want to argue with that?
 
The basic beleif in a magic God that can do anything nulifies the opportunity for any sort of rational debate.
jules's picture

thats fucking awesome. post that # in the shout box with a "call for free $25.00 Old Navy Gift Certificate" message.

geez. and i thought 'believing' made him irrational...

Jason's picture
I won't be using that info for evil - after all, a little Googling will give you dude's address, directions and pics of his house. It's not too surprising that he resides in Arkansas .
Sean Vollendorf's picture
I suspected you probably wouldn't call. I do, however, wish you the best of fortune in your pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness, my friend, and I mean that sincerely. Take care-
Bob Fredricks's picture
Before you start laughing at others, it would help you to get your own understanding of the issues, which you obviously have not advanced since high school. You come across as profoundly stupid when you fail to address even the simplest of his arguments, especially after you posted a serious rant on your blog. Have you even heard of Richard Dawkins or Stephen Gould? Do you understand that Darwin is not actually considered anything more than a weak starting point and that theories are quite different now than they were previously? Can you explain anything that you "believe" in from a purely scientific standpoint? How can you believe in something you can't explain? Doesn't that make you as bad as those you bash? Seems that you are both going on faith.
Toby's picture
Jason, you just proved Sean is more open- minded than you are; evolutionist claim to be so open-minded, but the more I read the more far fetched that idea is!!! In spite of the fact that evolution is just a theory, people go about saying it is a scientific fact... come-on; it has not been proven; it's all speculation!
Rick's picture
OK, so I know your post was written over a year ago, but somehow I stumbled upon it just now. Anywho, I'm a Christian with a fairly conservative theology, and I just want to say that "museums" like that just make me incredibly sad. I find no problem reading Genesis AND believing in evolution. Why can't God use evolution as means to create? What bothers me the most about the fundamentalists who built this embarrassing place is that their literal interpretation of Genesis is something the original writer of Genesis would have puked at. Anyone who's done serious and intelligent study of ancient literature would know that Genesis, along with everything else written during that era, is supposed to be read as allegorical, meaning it's not meant to teach us about science, it's meant to teach us about God; that he's the Creator and Sustainer of the universe and that he cares for his Creation--which was a totally new concept at that time! (My point isn't to declare those things, but merely to provide a non-scientific interpretation of Genesis.) So yeah, I just want to say that I'm embarrassed when people claim to raise the same banner that I do, and then build really unintelligent and lame "museums" like that one. Oh, and hopefully it goes without saying, but I disagree with the "science" of that Sean guy who was posting here. Like I said, I don't understand why a belief in God and in evolution have to be mutually exclusive. I think before I got into one of his debates about the validity of Creationsism, I'd want to know what in the Bible says I can't believe in both.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.